<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Nate Beck &#187; Tour de Flex</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.natebeck.net/tag/tour-de-flex/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.natebeck.net</link>
	<description>AIR, Flex / Flash, FMS, PushButton, Game... Developer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2011 21:24:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Tour de Flex&#8230; It&#8217;s no rubygems, but it&#8217;s a start.</title>
		<link>http://blog.natebeck.net/2009/01/its-no-rubygems-but-its-a-start/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.natebeck.net/2009/01/its-no-rubygems-but-its-a-start/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 19:07:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nate Beck</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Actionscript]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adobe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tour de Flex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.natebeck.net/?p=286</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mike Chambers has a blog post asking, &#8220;How can adobe make the as3 learning curve easier&#8221;? As I talked about in my Why YOU should contribute to Flex post, Adobe wants our input. Here they are again asking the community, &#8220;What do you think&#8221;? I commented on Mike&#8217;s post. I think that a more centralized]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike Chambers has a <a href="http://www.mikechambers.com/blog/2009/01/05/how-can-adobe-make-learning-actionscript-3-easier/">blog post</a> asking, &#8220;How can adobe make the as3 learning curve easier&#8221;?  </p>
<p>As I talked about in my <a href="http://blog.natebeck.net/2008/12/why-you-should-contribute-to-flex/">Why YOU should contribute to Flex</a> post, Adobe wants our input.  Here they are again asking the community, &#8220;What do you think&#8221;?</p>
<p>I commented on Mike&#8217;s post.</p>
<blockquote><p>I think that a more centralized component library and delivery system would make the lives of many developers much easier.</p>
<p>Take RubyGems for example. Itâ€™s extremely easy for developers to benefit from the work of others. This has increased the value of Ruby in my eyes tenfold.</p>
<p>As a developer, there isnâ€™t a uniform place that I can go check to see if someone has done this before. So I have to scour the net for a while trying to find a solution by looking through blogs, articles, googlecode, etcâ€¦</p>
<p>I know there are a few places out there that make this easier. RIAForge, Adobe Developer Connection, Project Sprouts, Adobe TV, flexcoders.</p>
<p>Most of these sites (blogs especially), have a way to externally interact with them. I think that an Adobe sponsored site or program that would allow a developer to quickly see whatâ€™s out there would be an amazing asset to brand new ActionScript developer and veterans alike.</p></blockquote>
<p>However, I didn&#8217;t realize until now, that Adobe is already doing this.  This dream &#8220;site or program&#8221; does exist as the <a href="http://flex.org/tour">Tour de Flex</a>.  Which if you haven&#8217;t installed yet, I highly recommend it.  </p>
<p>As the title of this post says, it&#8217;s no rubygems (not yet anyways)&#8230; but it&#8217;s a start.  Go Adobe!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.natebeck.net/2009/01/its-no-rubygems-but-its-a-start/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

